UNNECESSARY RESTRICTIONS PLACED ON RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS IN CURRENT DECLARED STATE OF EMERGENCY

Filed under: Opinion |


by Abduljebar Hussien

The constitution attempts to incorporate some substantive principles which are help full to safe guard against abuse of state of emergency. It requires the actual occurrence of an exceptional threat to the constitutional order. The circumstances of breakdown of law and order that endangers the constitutional order should be something which cannot be controlled by the less restrictive measures of the ordinary law. As state of emergency is an exceptional situation, the emergency measures are to be taken exceptionally as a last resort when possible ordinary law restrictive measures could not avert the crisis. the declaration of emergency must be a last resort to be taken only when the normal measures of public order have been exhausted and are not sufficient to deal with the situation; the declaration of state of emergency must be a temporary measure in which it must be for a well defined period, and can only be extended in accordance with the law.

The measures taken to avert the crisis should also be proportional to the threat posed by the crisis. Hence, suspension of rights and freedoms of citizens should be limited to the extent strictly required by the situation on the ground. ICCPR state that restrictions placed on rights and freedoms in times of public emergency must be limited “to the extent strictly required by the exigencies of the situation. According to the Human Rights Committee’s General Comment on Article 4 of the ICCPR, the requirement of proportionality “relates to the duration, geographical coverage and material scope of the state of emergency and any measures of derogation resorted to because of the emergency. Thus, “emergency power cannot be used to destroy the guaranteed rights altogether or to impose unwarranted limitations on their exercise. In other words, the principle of proportionality proscribes or forbids:

unnecessary suspension of specific rights,
greater restrictions on those rights than necessary, or
The unnecessary extension of the geographical area to which the state of emergency applies.

The principle of proportionality is also clearly provided under the FDRE constitution. Art. 93 (4) (b) empowers the council of ministers to suspend the rights and freedoms in the constitution to the extent necessary to avert the conditions that required the declaration of a state of emergency.The House of peoples representatives should examine the currently proclaimed state of emergency in line with the above parameter also.

One Response to UNNECESSARY RESTRICTIONS PLACED ON RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS IN CURRENT DECLARED STATE OF EMERGENCY

  1. Yes, other Ethiopians are hating Tegrians due to TPLF’s claims and the silence of people of Tegray for the last 27 years.

    TPLF committed genocide against various ethnic groups, against Ethiopian cultural+historical treasures.
    TPLF demolished our national integerity and sovereignity.
    TPLF has massacared the economic, land and natural resources of Ethiopia. TPLF has crushed the future economic potentials and sociocultural make ups of its people.

    Tegrians have been either supporters or beneficiaries of the reign of TPLF.

    Every other day, TPLF commits more crimes against Ethiopia/Ethopians.
    Every other day, many Ethiopians realize/come to know more about the evil TPLF and its supporters/sympathizers (Tegrians).

    Thus, every other day, our hate against Tegrians increases.

    Yes, we are hating Tegrians due to TPLF,

    stopping TPLF is good for all, especially for Tegrians and for TPLF families of TPLF leaders/members..

    Geberew
    February 28, 2018 at 2:49 pm
    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.